Recently for a job I was applying for I build a time tracking demo in React.
I’ve spent the last 4-5 years working with Angular (via Ionic) but many of the jobs I’ve seen are asking for React.
It’s been easy to pick up and a lot of fun to work with. I like having this app as a demo because as I learn new things I’m able to include them in the app.
For instance, I’m very fond of SCSS for writing my styles. Variables and mixins are nice, but I love nested styles. I found a package react-app-rewire-css-modules which supports SCSS. It allows me to include a stylesheet for each of my components (as a CSS Module).
I’ve also figured out Redux. I was expecting it to be more difficult, but once I had the pieces in place it’s actually pretty easy. I may run into issues with sharing data across reducers, but I’ll cross that bridge when I get there.
Are you interested in Laravel but don’t know how to start? Homestead is a Laravel project that simplifies the creation of a local environment configured to run Laravel applications. Bring your laptop and when we’re finished you’ll have Homestead running and a fresh install of Laravel ready to work with.
Recorded live at Madison Laravel on June 8th, 2017.
Do you have any thoughts on how [DomainSession] could be used from a CLI environment?
The first thing to ask yourself is how would you like sessions to work on the command line? There are a few ways this could work.
Each run has its own new session
The main reason I see for this option would be to reuse the domain logic from your web app and it depends on DomainSession. You don’t really care what gets stored in the session because you consider it temporary.
First, I init the script. In this case, since I’m using a Radar application, I just use Aura.Di directly to load DomainModule. This makes sure I have SessionManager and Home configured.
If I was doing this in production, I’d probably have a different definition for DomainModule that I used with the CLI that used the Memory storage instead of File storage. In this example, I won’t worry about that.
Then I can get a new instance of my domain object Home and call it with null as the $sessionId. This will let the SessionManager generate a new ID for this request.
Each run has its own new prepopulated session
If I need to prepopulate the session with data (like a logged in user) I can simply start a new session, assign the values I want to the session and finish it like normal. Then I can grab the session ID from that session and pass it into the domain object so it can reuse that session.
The next option would be if you wanted to reuse the session between script runs. You’ll need to determine how you want to store the $sessionId between script runs, but one way would be to print it in the output, then include it as a parameter when calling your script in the future.
These three ways illustrate some of the ways you could to go about solving this issue. There will most likely be specific requirements based on your application, but it will most likely be some variation of these. For instance instead of printing the $sessionId you might store it in a file.
What do you think? Let me know in the comments if you see any problems with these approaches.
Right before Christmas, I reached out to Paul Jones asking:
I’ve reached a point with a couple of my Radar projects where I need to add a login and set permissions. I’m trying to figure out the best way to handle this, especially with PSR-7 and ADR.
This led to discussing how to do sessions properly in Radar. I had read Paul’s post PSR-7 and Session Cookies which discussed how to tweak PHP Sessions to work better in a PSR-7 architecture. You don’t really want PHP automatically sending and reading cookies outside of the Request object.
Finally, the more I work with separated domain layer, the more I dislike the built-in PHP session system. Lately, I have started to consider avoiding it entirely, in favor of something like a custom DomainSession. Attached are my very rough notes-in-code; maybe they’ll be useful to you.
Needless to say, they have been very useful. Paul has been incredibly generous with his time and after going back and forth through several rounds of refactoring and revising I’m ready to officially announce Cadre.DomainSession. The current version as of this post is 0.4.0.
The reason for this package is that as Paul had said: “Anything that touches storage should be considered domain-layer work.” so it’s ok to read the session cookie in an Input class, and it’s ok to write the cookie in a Responder class, but pretty much everything else should be in the Domain layer.
In Application\Domain\Home I first inject the Cadre\DomainSession\SessionManager. Then I start the session with the session ID I passed in from the Input. I check to see if there is a timestamp session value (Unknown if not present) and assign it with the current timestamp. Finally, I finish the session which is what persists the data to storage. In this case, it’s just to the filesystem. One important thing to note is that I have to return the session object in the payload for the final step.
If you want to regenerate the session ID you can do so by calling $session->getId()->regenerate().
Persisting the Session ID in a Cookie
In Application\Delivery\DefaultResponder I check to see if there was a session in the payload. If there is, I check to see if the session ID has been updated (new or regenerated session id). If it’s been updated I persist the session ID value to the session cookie I’m reading from in the Input and that’s all there is to it.
I have some concerns with this library. The built-in session handling has withstood the test of time. It’s been looked at and I assume many security concerns have been fixed. I’m not a security expert, so I worry that there are vulnerabilities in my code.
In particular, I’m using what I consider to be a fairly naive method for generating session IDs.
I need to do some research and find if session_create_id would be a better method to use. I’m not sure if it just generates an ID or if it depends on the storage implementation.
What am I missing? Do you find this implementation useful? Let me know in the comments.
UPDATE: There is also an interesting conversation going over on Reddit.